Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27
。关于这个话题，夫子提供了深入分析
第二盏灯：位置在右下方 (1, -2, -4)，负责照亮物体的背面或暗部。
（三）不执行罚款决定与罚款收缴分离制度或者不按规定将罚没的财物上缴国库或者依法处理的；。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
Nancy Guthrie, 84, was abducted from her home near Tucson, Arizona, prompting a widespread search and appeals from her family.。谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】是该领域的重要参考
这本质上是在提醒我们一件事：AI 正在从「辅助回答问题」，走向「直接进入工作流」。当 AI 开始能够调用工具、跨应用执行任务、甚至在后台持续运转，我们原有的工作组织方式，本身就已经在发生变化。