GLM 给出结论，交给 NotebookLM 批判；NotebookLM 给出修正，交回 GLM 批判。来回几轮之后，一个经过双向检验的分析框架自然浮现出来。两个模型单独面对人类输入时都倾向于顺从，但面对另一个模型的结论时批判性会明显提高。字符渲染管线最难啃的部分就是用这个方式调出来的。
�������ǂނɂ́A�R�����g�̗��p�K���ɓ��ӂ��u�A�C�e�B���f�B�AID�v�����сuITmedia NEWS �A���J�[�f�X�N�}�K�W���v�̓o�^���K�v�ł�
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法下载获取更多信息
Brynjolfsson et al. (2025) compare employment trends for workers in more versus less AI-exposed occupations, using the task exposure measures from Eloundou et al. (2023) and payroll data from ADP. Johnston and Makridis (2025) do a similar task-based analysis using US administrative data, but they aggregate treatment to the industry level. Hui et al. (2024) study how freelance jobs on Upwork responded to the release of ChatGPT and advanced image generation tools, comparing workers in directly affected categories to those in unaffected categories before and after each tool's release date. Hampole et al. (2025) instrument for firm-level AI adoption using historical university hiring networks: firms that historically recruited from universities whose graduates later entered AI-related roles faced lower adoption costs.
adoption of new functionality, keeping outdated decisions in place and